A recent article in The Examiner (11 April 2026), titled “Where can I find help? New initiative to connect fathers of trans kids”, highlights a new initiative supporting fathers of transgender-identifying children. It raises an important issue — but also an important concern.
Where are the other voices?
The piece presents a single, affirming perspective: that supporting a child’s gender identity through transition leads to improved wellbeing. It shares positive personal stories and quotes advocacy organisations, but does not include perspectives from parents who have taken a more cautious approach, nor from those who have experienced more complex or difficult outcomes.
This absence matters.
Across Tasmania — and indeed internationally — many families are navigating these issues with care, uncertainty, and a desire to do what is best for their children. Some parents support social or medical transition. Others seek a more exploratory, psychological approach. Many are simply trying to understand a rapidly evolving and highly contested area of medicine.
These families are not fringe voices. They are part of the broader community, and their experiences are essential to any meaningful public conversation.
There is also a growing body of international research and policy development that reflects this complexity. Several European countries have shifted toward more cautious, evidence-based approaches, prioritising psychological support and careful assessment before medical intervention for minors. This reflects ongoing uncertainty about long-term outcomes, particularly for adolescents presenting with co-occurring mental health challenges.
None of this nuance is reflected in the article.
Instead, the issue is framed in a way that risks oversimplifying a deeply complex reality. When only one perspective is presented, it can create the impression that the science is settled and that there is consensus on the best course of action. That is not the case.
Fathers, in particular, are portrayed as needing to “catch up” or be “educated.” Yet many fathers are actively engaged, asking thoughtful questions about their children’s wellbeing, long-term health, and development. These are not unreasonable concerns — they are a fundamental part of responsible parenting.
It is also concerning that dissenting views are often framed as “misinformation” or hostility. This risks shutting down discussion and discouraging parents from seeking the information and support they need.
Good journalism does not require taking sides. But it does require presenting a diversity of perspectives, particularly on issues that are complex, evolving, and consequential for families.
Parents deserve access to balanced reporting that reflects the full range of experiences and viewpoints. They deserve space to ask questions without fear of being dismissed. And they deserve confidence that the information presented to them is complete, not selective.
If we are to genuinely support families and young people, we must begin with open, honest, and public conversation.
That starts with ensuring all voices are heard.
Dr. Elizabeth Caballero
Women Speak Tasmania
Op-ed to The Examiner on 11.04.26