Today, in an opinion article titled “Nature Such a Reassuring Obstacle to Opt-In Gender” (26 November 2018), columnist Jennifer Oriel criticised proposed Tasmanian reforms that would remove the automatic recording of sex on birth certificates and allow individuals to change the sex recorded on official documents through self-identification. Oriel argued that biological sex is an objective reality and expressed concern that public institutions, lawmakers, and advocacy organisations were increasingly adopting policies that, in her view, prioritised gender identity over biological sex. The article linked the Tasmanian reforms to broader national and international debates about transgender rights, identity documents, and the influence of the Yogyakarta Principles.
Oriel also highlighted concerns raised by Women Speak Tasmania regarding the potential impact of self-identification policies on women’s sex-based rights and protections. She cited comments from Bronwyn Williams, who argued that biological sex should be recognised and protected in law to safeguard women-only services and spaces. The article framed the Tasmanian reforms as part of a wider debate about freedom of expression, anti-discrimination laws, and the relationship between sex and gender identity, while criticising what the author described as increasing pressure to conform to particular views on gender and transgender issues.
Source: The Australian
Archive link: